STUDENT MOBILITY, TECHNOLOGY TOP SCHOOL BOARDS’ AGENDA

 

JAMESBURG, November 18, 2000—Representatives of local school boards throughout the state today called on the state and federal governments to address the high rates of student mobility in certain communities. 

Meeting as the Delegate Assembly of the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA), the local district representatives acted on 13 proposals submitted by local boards of education.  NJSBA is a federation of the state’s 602 local school boards; the Delegate Assembly is its major policy-setting body. 

Student Mobility   Delegates called on the state to conduct a comprehensive study of student mobility, its impact on education and learning, and funding problems. (click here for NJSBA's research into student mobility described in  the NJSBA School Finance Committee Report. A summary begins on page 5, and the full report begins on page 11. )

“Switching schools frequently can indicate severe problems, such as poverty, family instability, parents’ inability to maintain a home or job, and even drug use or child abuse,” said Patti J. Pawling, NJSBA president.  “Student mobility can hinder a child’s education because it can be difficult for schools to obtain past academic records of highly mobile students, and therefore make it hard to address the specific needs to the child.

“The study shows that student mobility may be having an impact on several New Jersey schools.  Clearly, we need a comprehensive statewide analysis to ensure that students have the necessary resources to succeed,” she continued.

According to a report presented to the NJSBA delegates today, almost 11% of the state’s elementary and high schools have student mobility rates exceeding 30%.  In 24.2% of New Jersey schools, more than 20% of the student population changes school midyear. 

Based on the report, the NJSBA delegates called on the state Board of Education to authorize a study into the causes of student mobility.  The study would also address—

·        Creation of a statewide database on mobile students

·        Programming designed to help mobile students

·        Reporting state test results separately for students enrolled in a school district less than two years

·        The financial impact of high mobility on districts and creation of a new category of aid to assist these districts.

The NJSBA delegates also voted to submit a resolution to National School Boards Association supporting the Federal Migrant Education Program and seeking its continued funding. 

Technology Endorsement  In other action, delegates approved a proposal from the Cherry Hill Board of Education (Camden County) calling for a teaching endorsement, or certificate, specifically for technology education. Teaching endorsements cover traditional academic areas, as well as subjects such as agriculture and driver’s education, but not technology.  However, the Cherry Hill resolution noted that without a technology teaching endorsement, a highly qualified computer science teacher could be “bumped” during a reduction in force and replaced by a veteran teacher with little or no familiarity with technology. Several states—including Massachusetts, Michigan, Kentucky, Idaho and Wisconsin—already have separate endorsements for technology education. 

“I can play the piano but that doesn’t make me a music teacher; I can use Microsoft Word, but that doesn’t make me a technology teacher,” said Donna Cohen of the Cherry Hill school board.  “We need to recognize the importance of having people trained and licensed in technology.” 

Class Size Reduction   The delegates also approved a proposal from the Cranford Board of Education (Union County) that calls on NJSBA to seek funding and resources to reduce class size in the primary grades.  Research has shown a class size of 15-20 students is especially helpful in raising academic achievement for students in the early grades.  However, school boards have difficulty reducing class sizes without jeopardizing other academic programs. 

 “Studies have shown that small class size has lifelong benefits for our children,” said Mary Catherine Sudiak of the Cranford board. 

Today’s decisions by the delegates guide NJSBA in representing school boards’ interests before the state Legislature, Congress and the courts.