|
P.O. Box 909 ● Trenton, NJ 08605-0909 ● Phone: 609.695.7600 ● Fax: 609.695.0413 ● Web: www.njsba.org/PI |
|
Updated July 30
Allow Citizens in Non-Operating Districts to Vote on Regionalization Plans—NJSBA TRENTON, June 25, 2009 — The New Jersey School Boards Association today urged the Corzine Administration and the Legislature to address the future of the state’s 26 non-operating school districts through the voter referendums on school district regionalization, which are planned for next year. Update: Gov. Jon Corzine signed into law S-3000/A-4141 on July 30. NJSBA’s statement comes in response to S-3000 (Whelan)/A-4141 (Burzichelli), administration bills on today’s Senate and Assembly agendas. The legislation would establish a process for eliminating the state’s non-operating districts without voter referendum. These districts send all of their students to nearby school systems on a tuition basis. Like other districts, they have unpaid school boards. Their paid staff, however, is limited to a part-time business clerk, who transmits tuition funds to other districts. “There are reasons why non-operating districts have continued to exist. In almost all cases, it is less costly for these communities to provide an education by sending all of their children to a neighboring school system on a tuition basis, rather than merging, or regionalizing, with other districts,” explained Marie S. Bilik, NJSBA executive director. “Considering the potential financial impact on their communities, the taxpayers in non-operating school districts should be able to approve or reject proposals to become part of larger regionalized systems. A-4141 does not allow for such a vote.” Previous legislation, enacted in 2007, called for two changes in school district structure in New Jersey: The development of plans to regionalize school districts, which would be submitted to voters of each affected municipality in 2010; and the outright elimination of the state’s 26 non-operating districts by March 2008, with no voter-approval. The state missed the March 2008 deadline for eliminating the non-operating districts, due in part to unforeseen complications involving the allocation of school costs among affected municipalities. A-4141 represents the administration’s effort to address the issue of property tax increases resulting from elimination of the non-operating districts. “We do not oppose regionalization when it is has educational and financial benefits and is approved by the voters of the affected communities,” said Bilik. “There is no reason to treat the citizens of non-operating school districts differently than residents of operating districts when considering regionalization or merger.“In light of the potential impact on their property taxes, citizens in non-operating school districts should be able to vote on regionalization plans that affect their future.” ********
The New Jersey School Boards Association, a federation of district boards of education, advocates the interests of school districts, trains local school board members, and provides resources for the advancement of public education. ###
|