|
P.O. Box 909 ● Trenton, NJ 08605-0909 ● Phone: 609.695.7600 ● Fax: 609.695.0413 ● Web: www.njsba.org/PI |
CONTACT: Frank Belluscio (fbelluscio@njsba.org) Mike Yaple (myaple@njsba.org) (609) 278-5202 Senate Panel OK’s Background Checks for Board Members TRENTON, October 14, 2010—The Senate Education Committee today released legislation that would require criminal background checks for local school board members. NJSBA, which was a prime mover behind the original background check requirement for school employees, supports the bill. However, it is seeking amendments that would permit school districts, not uncompensated board members, to pay for the cost of the checks and would extend the background check requirement to charter school trustees and other elected officials. Senator Diane Allen, a sponsor of the Senate version of the bill, S-295, has indicated a willingness to implement the amendments through separate legislation. The legislation, which has already passed the Assembly, is now in position for a vote by the full Senate. NJSBA’s position statement is reprinted below. Position Statement Seeking Amendment to Disqualifies member of board of education for conviction of certain crimes and requires member to undergo criminal history background investigation. The New Jersey School Boards Association, which believes that protecting the health and safety of our students is among the paramount responsibilities of the public schools, supports the intent of S-295 and A-444. NJSBA was a prime mover behind the original legislation to require criminal background checks for school employees and has been a consistent supporter of efforts to strengthen that law. NJSBA believes that, to ensure an informed electorate and preserve the interests of the community, candidates for school board office and current school board members should disclose any past criminal convictions as defined by Title 2C of the New Jersey Criminal Code. Requiring criminal history checks, as specified in the proposed legislation, would be consistent with this belief. Fulfilling the responsibilities of school board office does not require an individual board member to have contact with public school students. In fact, outside a legally constituted meeting, an individual board member has no more authority than that of any other citizen. The same rules, guidelines and restrictions governing access to public schools by private citizens apply to individual school board members. Nonetheless, there are occasions when an individual board member may be present in a school building or at a school function involving students upon the authorization of the board of education. A school board has fiduciary responsibilities to the taxpayers and the community. The disqualifying offenses listed in S-295 and A-444 include those that constitute a violation of the public’s trust and, therefore, are philosophically consistent with the provisions of the New Jersey School Ethics Act. While it supports the goal of the legislation, the New Jersey School Boards Association, a federation of 588 local boards, which includes 44 charter school associate members, asks the bill’s sponsors to consider the following amendments:
In addition, NJSBA’s current policy, in place since 2005, calls for additions to existing disclosure processes to address past criminal convictions. Therefore, we request that the following additions be made to A-444:
The New Jersey School Boards Association urges the Senate Education Committee to incorporate the above amendments into the legislation prior to its release. ********
The New Jersey School Boards Association is a federation of 588 local boards of education and includes 44 charter school associate members. NJSBA advocates the interests of school districts, trains local school board members, and provides resources for the advancement of public education. ###
|