Accountability Bill Is Signed into Law

State Loosens At-Risk Aid Restrictions

NJSBA Online Training Answers Tax Cap Questions

Willa Spicer Named Deputy Commissioner

N.J. Ed Department Restructured

New Cost of Ed Study

Autism Package

End-of-Route Inspections

March 27 Voter Registration Deadline

Court Upholds Videotaping

Voters Reject School Construction Proposal

NJSBA Online

Resolutions Subcommittee to Meet

Labor Relations Consultant Retires

NJSBA Training Programs This Month

Council Seeks Input on Mandate

DOE Launches Web Page for Spanish-Speaking Families

Milestone Award

Calendar

Click here for a pdf version of this issue of School Board Notes

State Loosens At-Risk Aid Restrictions

The state Department of Education has set limited conditions—generally attached to the federal No Child Left Behind act—under which targeted at-risk aid could be used for property tax relief. The criteria are listed in a March 9 memo to superintendents and school business administrators.

Previously, state education officials indicated that the aid, which will total $66 million statewide, could only be directed toward programs to close the achievement gap. Examples would include full-day kindergarten, academic preschool, or elementary math and literacy programs.

“Upon further review, it has been determined that [the funds] could be used for tax relief upon demonstration to the Department that the district is already addressing the needs of low-income students,” Katherine P. Attwood, the department’s director of fiscal policy and planning, wrote in the March 9 memo.

To Qualify Statewide, 217 districts qualify for at-risk aid. The following criteria would determine if a district could use the funds for tax relief:

• Elementary-school and K-12 districts must demonstrate that economically disadvantaged students met the state-determined adequate yearly progress (AYP) goals under No Child Left Behind for 2006 at grades 3-5 and 6-8.

• Regional high school districts must show that low-income students made AYP in 2006 on the state’s High School Proficiency Exam.

• Districts that did not make AYP in 2006 could use the funds for tax relief if, over the past three years, their economically disadvantaged students made progress toward the benchmarks.

• Districts where poor students did not make AYP as described above may use some at-risk funds for tax relief if their equalized tax rate is 20 percent above the state average.

The criteria do not apply to vocational-technical school districts, which must apply all at-risk funds to programs.

The education department’s March 9 memo also includes updates on other state aid categories, including new funding for full-day kindergarten, as well as budget development and advertising information.