It’s Official: Governor Signs School Funding Bill

It’s Official: Governor Signs School Funding Bill

Gov. Jon Corzine on Sunday signed into law the School Funding Reform Act of 2008, the new state funding formula for schools.

The act will increase state aid to education by $532 million in 2008-2009, guaranteeing a minimum 2-percent increase for every district. Many districts, notably non-Abbott districts with high concentrations of low-income students and growing enrollment, will see state aid increases up to 20 percent.

Departure The new school finance system represents a significant departure from previous school funding methods in that it blurs the distinction between Abbott and non-Abbott districts.

It requires districts to provide a local “fair share” contribution of property taxes to support schools, and establishes an “adequacy budget” for each district. The adequacy budget is based on the expenditure needed to provide a thorough and efficient education, as well as enrollment and factors such as the number of special education students and at-risk, or poor, students.

Significant changes include the distribution of a large share of special education funding on a wealth basis and a requirement that some districts direct part of their state aid increases to property tax reduction. Districts affected by the tax-reduction requirement are those that are already spending above their adequacy budget and which have school tax levies above their fair share contribution, as determined by the formula.

Critics Weigh In Some opponents of the plan say the measure does not meet the constitutional test set by the state Supreme Court’s series of rulings in Abbott v. Burke. Others find the amounts used to determine the “adequacy budget” to be too low, considering current statewide average spending per pupil.

At the same time, a number of districts that are currently spending below the adequacy amounts, but which have to tax above their fair share amounts, would receive significant increases. The increases also result from concentrations of low-income students and/or enrollment growth in those communities.

While NJSBA appreciates the increased aid to a large number of districts, it continues to oppose certain elements of the new law. For example, the Association objects to provisions forcing some districts to apply part of their state aid increases to property tax reduction; distributing special education on a wealth-equalized basis; and using per capita income, rather than property wealth alone, as a factor in determining a district’s fair share contribution to education costs.