When you think about it, the architecture of most K-12 schools today is designed for an instructional model that’s long outdated.

Schools typically are organized into long, often windowless corridors, lined with 900-square-foot classrooms — a floor plan that consigns teachers and students to working in relative isolation behind closed doors.
It’s an assembly line design that crowds teachers and students into a single room that’s less than ideal for engaging in multiple activities at the same time. Space is limited and noisy if students are working collaboratively. Other useful space — such as libraries, science labs, or other instructional areas — are down the hall and out of sight of the teacher.

None of this was a problem in the 1950s, when teachers were more likely to stand at the front of the classroom and lecture—and students were expected to listen or work quietly at their desks.

But this industrial-era floor plan is far from ideal for the kind of instruction that’s needed in the 21st century.
Today, technology plays an increasingly active role in daily classroom work, and educators see the ideal instructional model to prepare students to be college- and career-ready as incorporating a mix of small-group collaboration, personalized instruction, projected-oriented learning, and student-led learning.

To make this possible, however, teachers need more room — and, more importantly, more flexibility in their instructional space to permit different learning activities to take place at the same time.

What’s needed is a school building like Dearborn STEM Academy’s new modernistic, cutting-edge campus, now under construction in Boston.

FLEXIBLE ENVIRONMENTS A glance at the architectural drawings for this new building, which the grades six through 12 academy will move into next year, reveals a working environment that wouldn’t be out of place on the high-tech “campus” headquarters of such cutting-edge, high-tech corporations as Apple, Google, or Microsoft.

The core of this brick-and-glass structure is a huge “learning commons atrium” that soars four stories high. On each floor, a balcony encircles this large open area and serves as a hallway to the classrooms and other instructional space that line the building’s outer walls.

For all of the aesthetics of this $70 million project, the truly important design element of the 128,000-square-foot building is the flexibility of its learning areas, specifically designed to meet the instructional needs of teachers and students in the 21st century, says Jonathan Levi, whose architectural firm designed the school.
Instructional space is organized into cohorts that group classrooms, science labs, makerspaces, and smaller, more flexible learning areas into small, separate learning communities.

The goal is to provide teachers and students with a variety of learning areas for collaboration, project-based learning, and independent work, Levi says. For example, some students can work on a class project in a main classroom, while the teacher takes a handful of students into a smaller, adjacent room for more personalized instruction.

Meanwhile, another group of students might collaborate on a report at a nearby “learning commons”— an open area of tables, chairs, and whiteboards that will be located on the balcony/hallway outside the classroom.

This classroom arrangement provides teachers with the space and flexibility to have students engage in multiple activities without being crowded into the limited and artificial confines of a single classroom. Yet, the teacher can keep an eye on everyone: Floor-to-ceiling glass walls provide a line of sight to each of these instructional areas.

“The old-school designs need to respond to the change in pedagogy,” Levi says. For 21st century learning, “there is a need for a lot more space than is avail- able in a traditional school. … More room is needed for multiple activities to go on simultaneously, without interfering with one another.”

NEW WAY TO TEACH Similar thinking went into the design of Hamilton Southeastern College and Career Academy in Fishers, Indiana. This new addition to a local high school organizes classrooms into “learning hubs” with glass walls that open, large collaborative spaces, and a 5,500-square-foot science lab that allow students from multiple classes to meet together.

The flexibility of this design aligns closely with the school district’s efforts to move from teacher-directed to student-led instruction, says Principal Matthew Kegley.

“That was what we were going for when we built our spaces,” he says. “You can move the walls and make three classrooms into one giant classroom. You can write on the glass walls and post on them. We have teachers dividing up their classes, letting them go to areas outside the classroom, yet to places where teachers can still see students.”

This push for flexibility may mean “there is no front to the classroom” anymore, suggests “Blended Learning Design Guidelines,” a white paper produced by Perkins Eastman, an international design and architectural firm.

In principle, with blended learning “all class lecture-style instruction is minimized to perhaps five percent of the school day in favor of individual, small group, direct engagement,” the paper suggests. “This creates an environment that’s focused on [a variety of learning areas] rather than any single point.”

This thinking can be seen at Dearborn — and in dozens of other award-winning school designs that feature numerous styles of learning areas. It’s also inspired an aesthetic that mirrors the modernistic and exciting new look of cutting-edge college and corporate offices.

The goals of making students “college- and career-ready,” along with a growing interest in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) education also are encouraging the development of learning environments that emphasize collaboration, personal responsibility, and project management.

“There’s a lot of energy around these ideas, STEM in particular,” says Sean O’Donnell, principal and K-12 practice area leader at Perkins Eastman. “We’re getting calls almost every other day from school districts looking to create this sort of great interdisciplinary, active-based learning environment.”

A TOUCH OF NATURE As architects design these flexible and engaging learning environments for students and teachers, they’re not overlooking an important asset that surrounds every school: the outdoors.

Although outdoor classrooms have been a fixture of education since Socrates, there has been growing interest in incorporating courtyards, green spaces, gardens, nature walks, and “outdoor learning labs” to recent school construction and renovation projects.

One such school is Solana Ranch Elementary School in San Diego, California. Taking advantage of the region’s warmer climate, architects designed many classrooms with sliding glass or garage-style doors that open up an outer wall and expand classroom instructional space to outdoor tables and benches.

Meanwhile, Richard J. Lee Elementary School in Irving, Texas, features an outdoor courtyard in the middle of the building, with stepped seating allowing a class to meet in the fresh air and natural light. Adjacent to the school are a paved courtyard, pond, and garden that teachers and students can use, as well.

School leaders and architects also are taking a lesson from research showing that bringing natural light inside schools has a measurable impact on student learning and engagement. At Dearborn STEM Academy, for example, many classrooms will feature wall-to-ceiling windows, while skylights over the central atrium will bathe the school’s interior with natural light.

In Florida, the Orange County Public Schools have worked to incorporate many of these design elements into the schools constructed or renovated in recent years, says Faz Ali, the district’s senior facilities director for planning and design. Not all of these elements are cutting edge — an outdoor classroom may be a simple grouping of benches under a tree — but it has its benefits.

“Having an indoor/outdoor connection is a big part of what’s happening now,” he says. “Outdoor classrooms, gardens — things of that nature — are very, very important so that kids can touch and feel the outdoors.”

TECHNOLOGY’S IMPACT Not surprisingly, technology is a growing influence in the design of modern schools. Where computers were once consigned to a specialized classroom, laptops and hand-held devices today are a ubiquitous presence — and technology’s increasing importance in everyday learning must be incorporated into the physical infrastructure of every campus.

Dearborn STEM Academy offers flexible space for teacher offices, meeting areas, and a communal open area on each floor.

At Hamilton Academy, “we created a couple rooms as ‘project presentation labs,’ Kegley says. “They’re just collaboration spaces where you can have six students, with six stations tied to a projector and screen. You can project your table’s work on your [laptop] screen or throughout the room.”

Laptop computers and personal devices also are being accommodated in different ways. There is a greater need for tables with “plug and play” power and data ports, and, as at Hamilton Academy, there’s a growing prevalence of smart boards and video screens that are accessible to student devices by physical port or Wi-Fi.

As more schools focus on STEM education, other design elements making their appearance are makerspaces, robotics rooms, and fabrication laboratories dedicated to project-based learning not easily conducted in a regular classroom.

Yet, as much as possible, educators and architects are trying to incorporate the needs of project-based learning as close to the classroom as possible, O’Donnell says. “Could every classroom be a makerspace?” he asks. “Not every room can have a band saw in it—that kind of equipment needs to be in its own space. But you can do a lot with a hot glue gun, cutting board, and cardboard. That’s how I went through architecture school. So, what you may need is a layout table, a place where you can start to assemble a project. You may need a little alcove and some shelving to support these kinds of activities.”

Thought is going into some of the subtle changes in learning created by personal devices. As elementary schools build common learning areas adjacent to classrooms, architects are incorporating small nooks — some with beanbag chairs — where younger students can sit and work independently on their devices. At high schools, coffee shops and lounge areas allow older students to use their time as they see fit, whether it’s working on a class assignment or taking a break and watching Netflix.

READY FOR TOMORROW The challenge with all this technology, however, is that it keeps changing, which poses a dilemma for school leaders and architects. Older schools built for an era of pencils and blackboards must be upgraded to handle whiteboards, hand-held devices, and increasingly high-tech equipment.
Yet, what about newer schools? Can they be designed so they will not be obsolete before their time?
These questions have school officials and architects pondering how to design modern schools so they can more easily adapt to the unpredictable needs of instruction in future decades.

One response to this concern may be found in the new science and technology building being built on the campus of California’s Santa Monica High School. The $55 million construction project features a modern design with fewer load-bearing walls and a raised floor, a design that allows walls to be reconfigured more easily in the future, while new wiring and data ports can be moved by lifting floor panels.

The design is more expensive to build, but the school district will see savings in the long run, says John Dale, principal and studio leader of the pre K-12 + community education design studio at Harley Ellis Devereaux Architects.

“There’s a premium to do raised floors, but if they want to rearrange space to make smaller or bigger learning spaces, you can just lift up a tile and drop in a new receptacle. It makes sense. Education is changing quickly, and you can go into the building in the summer and make significant changes and be ready for the fall.”

That’s not to suggest that existing buildings cannot be adapted to the needs of 21st century learning, O’Donnell adds.

Nearly 70 percent of the school design work done by Perkins Eastman involves older buildings, he says. Recently, the firm designed the renovation of Watkins Elementary School in Washington, D.C., providing the aging school with more open, light-filled classrooms; larger, more flexible rooms; and a state-of-the-art media center.

“I think a lot of what we were able to do surprised people,” O’Donnell says. “Before we started the project, most people just wanted to tear the building down. They saw it as obsolete. They didn’t believe it had any potential to be a 21st century learning environment. But when they enter the school today, they change their mind.”

MOVING FORWARD For the immediate future, several factors are converging that require school leaders to educate themselves on the design elements needed in new schools — and it’s not too early to start learning, Levi says.

“The rapid advance of technology and the very different way teachers approach teaching today, along with the almost simultaneous [aging] of the nation’s education infrastructure, is creating a tremendous need to rebuild schools — yet school officials have very little knowledge about what education will look like 10 or 20 years from now.”

The good news is that school leaders can easily access the resources they need to make sound policy decisions on construction and renovation projects, architects say.

For starters, a school district’s facilities personnel are a valuable resource. So, hopefully, your school board is strengthening your staff members’ knowledge base by supporting attendance at conferences and other professional development opportunities that keep them on top of the latest issues and trends in school architecture.

It also wouldn’t hurt your school board to do a little research itself — if only to learn enough to ask informed questions of school facility directors and architects. O’Donnell suggests that a good start is to go online and visit websites that highlight award-winning school projects. If any projects look appealing, he says, go visit them.

Also take advantage of the practical knowledge of those who will work in your new buildings, he says. Survey teachers about the design elements they’d like to see in a new school, and work with an architect who is willing to engage with teachers about how they teach and what they need in instructional space to get their job done.

“Just start a conversation, O’Donnell says. “We’re modernizing so many of our schools these days. We shouldn’t necessarily be doing the same things that we’ve been doing for the past 10, 20, or even 30 years.”

Del Stover is senior editor of American School Board Journal.

Reprinted with permission from American School Board Journal, February 2018. Copyright 2018 National School Boards Association. All rights reserved.