Whether you’re a new board member or a seasoned veteran, there are always new leadership skills to explore. NJSBA offers training opportunities to help you reach your full potential as a board member.
Ethics 12-24(d) – Independence of JudgmentComplainant filed a complaint with the School Ethics Commission alleging that a former board member had violated the School Ethics Act when she responded to a question on social media as to why she had blocked certain members from the public from her Facebook page. Responded responded that she blocked certain people due to the harassment of her own child. Complainant alleged that his statement, by attributing harassment to those persons that had been blocked, had the affect of accusing certain children of the harassing behavior. The School Ethics Commission held that there was no violation of the School Ethics Act. The Commission also provided helpful guidance on disclaimer statements that school board members can use on social media to insure that it is clear that any dialogue is done in a private capacity and not in his or her role as a board member. Melnyk v. Fiel 3/26/2019.
Ethics-GenerallyThe complaint alleged that certain comments and votes of the board member violated the Act by administering the schools, making personal promises/private action, and failing to appoint the best qualified personnel after consideration of the CSA. Fredericks v. Foody 4/22/2019.
Respondent was a member and Board President of the South Orange-Maplewood School District. During her tenure, a fellow board member was involved in a traffic stop with police in which her conduct was questioned as inappropriate. During the investigation into the conduct of the Board member, it was alleged that defendant overstepped her bounds by withholding information from other board members, concealing the conduct of the member and deceiving the board by stating that the matter could not be discussed during the pendency of the investigation. In response to a motion to dismiss, the School Ethics Commission dismissed the charges stating that, even if all facts were true, there was no evidence that petitioner violated the School Ethics Act by waiting to discuss the matter with the Board while it was being investigated. Fields v. Lawson-Muhammad 3/26/2019.
Settlement-AgreementThis case was resolved via a settlement agreement. Walker v. Raftopoulos-Johnson 3/26/2019.
Published: March 30, 2020
You might also be interested in:
News
Daily Clips 5/16/25
NEW JERSEY EDUCATION NEWSChalkbeatNJ will implement its new literacy plan next school year. Will schools be ready?New Jersey’s new, first-of-its-kind literacy plan aims to boost early reading skills among young learners, but advocates worry schools won’t be ready to roll...
05/16/2025
Daily Clips 5/15/25
NEW JERSEY EDUCATION NEWSNJ.com on MSN2 of the last N.J. districts without full-day kindergarten ready to switchOnly ten New Jersey school districts don’t offer free, full-day kindergarten for all students.N.J.’s highest-paid teachers: See the districts where median salaries top $100K...
05/15/2025
Daily Clips, 5/13-14/2025
NJSBA NEWS & INFORMATIONSchool Board Notes, 5/13/25NJSBA Delegate Assembly Elects Officers; Education Bills Clear CommitteesNEW JERSEY EDUCATION NEWSChalkbeatOnly 73 teens voted in Newark’s school board election amid low turnoutOnly 73 teen voters — out of 1,851 who had registered —...