Whether you’re a new board member or a seasoned veteran, there are always new leadership skills to explore. NJSBA offers training opportunities to help you reach your full potential as a board member.
Ethics 12-24(d) – Independence of JudgmentComplainant filed a complaint with the School Ethics Commission alleging that a former board member had violated the School Ethics Act when she responded to a question on social media as to why she had blocked certain members from the public from her Facebook page. Responded responded that she blocked certain people due to the harassment of her own child. Complainant alleged that his statement, by attributing harassment to those persons that had been blocked, had the affect of accusing certain children of the harassing behavior. The School Ethics Commission held that there was no violation of the School Ethics Act. The Commission also provided helpful guidance on disclaimer statements that school board members can use on social media to insure that it is clear that any dialogue is done in a private capacity and not in his or her role as a board member. Melnyk v. Fiel 3/26/2019.
Ethics-GenerallyThe complaint alleged that certain comments and votes of the board member violated the Act by administering the schools, making personal promises/private action, and failing to appoint the best qualified personnel after consideration of the CSA. Fredericks v. Foody 4/22/2019.
Respondent was a member and Board President of the South Orange-Maplewood School District. During her tenure, a fellow board member was involved in a traffic stop with police in which her conduct was questioned as inappropriate. During the investigation into the conduct of the Board member, it was alleged that defendant overstepped her bounds by withholding information from other board members, concealing the conduct of the member and deceiving the board by stating that the matter could not be discussed during the pendency of the investigation. In response to a motion to dismiss, the School Ethics Commission dismissed the charges stating that, even if all facts were true, there was no evidence that petitioner violated the School Ethics Act by waiting to discuss the matter with the Board while it was being investigated. Fields v. Lawson-Muhammad 3/26/2019.
Settlement-AgreementThis case was resolved via a settlement agreement. Walker v. Raftopoulos-Johnson 3/26/2019.
Published: March 30, 2020
You might also be interested in:
News
Voters Decide Proposed Construction Questions in December 2025 Special School Election
Voters went to the polls on Dec. 9 to vote on school construction questions. Statewide, the New Jersey School Boards Association learned of four (4) boards of education with construction on the ballot. Information is acquired from county clerk offices...
12/15/2025
Daily Clips 12/12/25
NOTICE: Beginning on Monday, Dec. 15, Daily Clips will be on hiatus through the holiday season and begin again on Jan. 5, 2026. NEW JERSEY EDUCATION NEWS Asbury Park Press NJ teachers are essential workers for COVID compensation: High court...
12/12/2025
Daily Clips 12/11/25
NJSBA NEWS School Board Notes – 12/9/25 Honoring NJSBA’s 2025 ‘Unsung Superheroes in Education’ NEW JERSEY EDUCATION NEWS Asbury Park Press Matawan-Aberdeen schools reopen to community groups after vandalism – MSN.com The Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District is reopening its facilities...